Contents
As a maker of custom knives who’s spent years at the forge and at the platen of a 2×72, here’s the non-romantic truth: the parts you can’t see—heat treatment and geometry—usually decide performance more than the way the blank was born. “Forging” moves hot steel to near-net shape, then requires careful normalization and finishing; “stock removal” profiles and grinds a bar, then hardens and tempers with equal care. When knife steel selection, austenitize/quench/temper, and thickness-behind-the-edge are controlled, forged and stock-removed knives can perform essentially the same in edge retention and toughness. Where the routes diverge is in shop economics, feature freedom (integral bolsters, distal tapers, fullers), and how each process handles stainless or high-alloy PM grades. So let’s separate romance from results and focus on what truly changes—and what emphatically doesn’t—in the finished knife. (knifesteelnerds.com)
Image credit: spokesman.com
If cutting performance is the goal, prioritize steel, heat-treat control, and geometry before you worry about how the shape was made. A properly plate-quenched AEB-L or well-run CPM-154 cycle will out-cut a poorly treated 1095, whether the 1095 was hammered or ground, because carbide population, hardness, and microstructure come from thermal processing—not decibels per swing. Edge life and feel in the cut are dominated by thickness behind the edge, apex stability, and sensible hardness targets for the task at hand. That’s why controlled austenitizing, the correct quenchant (fast oils, AAA-class, or plates), and a disciplined two-temper matter more than “forged” stamped on a product page. In the literature, method parity with proper heat treat is the consistent finding. (AEB-L)
In stock removal, the process is subtractive from start to finish. I lay out the pattern on flat stock, saw or waterjet the profile, and true everything at the platen. Holes are drilled while soft; bevels are roughed in with coarse belts, keeping a centered scribe line honest. Heat treatment follows steel-specific schedules: stainless and many PM grades are wrapped or run in low-oxygen conditions and plate-quenched for flatness and fast cooling; simple and low-alloy steels go to appropriate oils. After a two-temper, I refine bevels, control distal taper at the grinder, and walk the grit progression to the desired finish. The path lends itself to repeatability and tight tolerances, especially with stainless and PM steels. (Wikipedia)
Image credit: thepracticalengineer.com
In forging, hot work under a hammer or press pushes steel into near-net geometry before the grinder ever sings. That’s perfect for integrals, forged fullers, and tapered tangs where mass distribution matters. But hot work adds thermal history, scale, and decarb, so I “pay the debt” with normalization and thermal cycling to reset grain and remove stresses before hardening. Quench choice matches the alloy: Parks-50-class fast oil for shallow-hardening grades like 1095, suitable oils for 80CrV2/5160, and very careful practice when the project involves stainless or PM alloys. After temper, I grind away the scale/decarb allowance, dial edge thickness, and finish. Done right, forging saves belts on complex shapes and delivers features that would be wasteful to grind in from plate. (knifesteelnerds.com)
Image credit: spokesman.com
Forging primarily changes how efficiently you can build macro-geometry into the blank. It’s the clean way to execute integral bolsters, pronounced distal tapers, and weight-forward or weight-neutral balance without hogging away half a bar of steel. That translates to less abrasive consumption and shorter grinding time on complex builds. Stock removal, by contrast, shines in consistency across batches and in controlling warpage on thin sections—especially in stainless/PM blades where plate quenching and tight austenitizing windows produce excellent uniformity. Both routes still demand allowance to remove decarb or heat-treat scale and careful fixturing to manage straightness. The difference is design latitude versus repeatability rather than any baked-in performance advantage.
At the cutting edge, physics is unimpressed by origin stories. Grain size and carbide distribution are set by the thermal cycle—normalize if forged, then austenitize correctly and quench at the right speed—followed by a temper that lands the target HRC. Those steps determine toughness and edge retention far more reliably than whether an anvil or a bandsaw did the early shaping. Corrosion resistance remains alloy-dependent; forging doesn’t add chromium, nitrogen, or molybdenum that isn’t already present. With matched steel, hardness, and geometry, forged and stock-removed blades cut strikingly similarly in controlled tests and shop experience alike. In other words, the knife becomes a performer when heat treat and geometry are right, not because of how loudly it was made. (dl.asminternational.org)
Simple and low-alloy carbon steels like 1095, 80CrV2, 5160, and 52100 reward forging: they tolerate hot work well and respond beautifully to normalization and fast-oil quenches, delivering fine grain and solid toughness. By contrast, high-alloy stainless and PM grades like AEB-L and CPM-154 prefer oxygen-limited austenitizing and immediate plate quench for flatness and fast cooling, which aligns neatly with stock-removal workflows. That’s not to say stainless can’t be forged—it can—but the process window is narrow, decarb risk rises, and the benefits are smaller unless you specifically need integral geometry in stainless. Pattern-welded Damascus is forged to make the billet, but many makers then switch to stock removal for final geometry because it protects pattern clarity and dimensional control. Smarter shops simply pick the steel whose best practices match the equipment and the feature set they want, then run the right schedule. (Heat Treat 80CrV2)
Let’s retire “edge packing” and magical “grain flow at the edge.” Hammering can align flow lines in a billet, but normalization erases the deformation history relevant to the cutting apex; refinement is earned in the furnace, not by peening the edge. Likewise, water is not “harder” by default—quench severity must fit the alloy or you trade hardness for cracks and warpage. Mirror flats don’t prove anything about micro-geometry either; many working knives finish at practical grits with a controlled micro-bevel for bite. The durable, repeatable wins come from accurate temperatures, appropriate quench media (Parks 50/AAA/plates), and two tempers tuned to the use case. Good knives are boringly scientific behind the scenes.
Treat the method as context, not a verdict. Start with the steel call-out (know what AEB-L, CPM-154, 80CrV2, and 1095 imply), the stated hardness range for the job, and any heat-treat notes (plate quench for stainless, fast oil for shallow hardeners, double temper). Then look for geometry numbers that matter: spine thickness and thickness behind the edge before sharpening tell you more about cutting than any superlative. Integrals and dramatic tapers are forging’s design playground, but they still rise or fall on heat treat and final geometry; conversely, a stock-removed stainless laser that’s plate-quenched and dead-straight will often outperform a heavier forged build in kitchen use. If a page trumpets “forged” but hides steel, hardness, and grind specifics, you’re reading marketing, not specifications. (Wikipedia)
Forging and stock removal are simply two roads to the same summit. The finished knife earns its keep when steel choice, austenitizing, the right quenchant (fast oil, AAA, or plates), and disciplined tempering intersect with geometry that respects how knives actually cut. Forging shines when you need near-net features—integral bolsters, deep fullers, purposeful distal taper—without burning through abrasive; stock removal excels at repeatability, flatness, and tight control with stainless and PM steels. Neither route rescues sloppy heat treat, careless grinding, or neglect of decarb and warpage. If you’re buying, look for clear steel and HRC, a credible heat-treat description, and real geometry numbers; if you’re commissioning, pick the route that best delivers the features you want and insist on the same uncompromising thermal discipline either way. That’s how you turn good steel into a great knife.
Author: Aleks Nemtcev | Knifemaker with 10+ Years of Experience | Connect with me on LinkedIn |
There are no comments for this article yet.